Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A3400 IS was announced 2 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A3400 IS matches up versus the Tough-3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Olympus Tough-3000
| A3400 IS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon A3400 IS
| Tough-3000 | A3400 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus Tough-3000
| A3400 IS | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon A3400 IS enjoys external measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the A3400 IS against the Tough-3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3400 IS and Tough-3000 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The image below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A3400 IS and Tough-3000.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Canon A3400 IS to give you greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern A3400 IS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $230 | $0 |
