Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was unveiled 16 months before the Tough-3000 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-520 grades vs the Tough-3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-520 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-520
Tough-3000 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | August 2008 | Newer by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-520 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 offers external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 vs the Tough-3000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and Tough-3000 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $0 |