Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Canon A3400 IS versus Ricoh WG-70, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the A3400 IS (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A3400 IS was unveiled 9 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the A3400 IS matches up against the WG-70 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Ricoh WG-70
| A3400 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon A3400 IS
| WG-70 | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 97 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Ricoh WG-70
| A3400 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A3400 IS features outside dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A3400 IS versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the A3400 IS and the WG-70.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A3400 IS and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3400 IS and WG-70.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of files although you would want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged A3400 IS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon A3400 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126 grams (0.28 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $230 | $280 |
