Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A490 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the A490 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A490 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the A490 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A490 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Canon A490 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A490 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A490 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A490
XZ-2 iHS | A490 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 35 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon A490 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
A490 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A490 offers outer dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the A490 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A490 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A490 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The A490 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give you extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older A490 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon A490 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot A490 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A490 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 5 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $99 | $450 |