Clicky

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A490 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Canon A490
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Canon A490 versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the A490 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The A490 was launched 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the A490 matches up versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A490 over the Samsung WB800F

 A490 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon A490

 WB800F A490 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2010Newer by 36 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k115kClearer screen (+345k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon A490 and Samsung WB800F

 A490 WB800F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A490 enjoys physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon A490 versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the A490 compared to the WB800F.

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A490 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A490 and WB800F.

Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged A490 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A490 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography information
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
44
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon A490 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
46
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon A490 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB800F Sports photography factors
16
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
53
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Canon A490 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Canon A490 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
50
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A490 Vlogging info
Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
21
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
35
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (218g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A490 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A490 and Samsung WB800F
 Canon PowerShot A490Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand Name Canon Samsung
Model type Canon PowerShot A490 Samsung WB800F
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-01-05 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 5 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 pounds) 218g (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $99 $300