Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbde0/bbde0b2c449374bbe735730425e6fe0e1983d8cd" alt="Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eae0/3eae05c1276f3b2941ab30fe976eb46facbb19df" alt="FujiFilm FinePix AX350 front FujiFilm FinePix AX350 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
16 Overall
29
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-165mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AX355
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and AX350 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The A495 was manufactured 12 months prior to the AX350 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the A495 grades versus the AX350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A495 & FujiFilm FinePix AX350. The entire galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & FujiFilm AX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the FujiFilm AX350
A495 | AX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AX350 over the Canon A495
AX350 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and FujiFilm AX350
A495 | AX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon A495 has exterior measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the FujiFilm AX350 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the A495 compared to the AX350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d277a/d277a4a776cb7477c0960aacf537a04042003401" alt="Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 size comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and AX350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/116e0/116e05816cd377e484fc224d6115235793def847" alt="Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and AX350.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the FujiFilm AX350 to render more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e4c/f9e4cd9922a1fed2a595b08b3c00787c3b000601" alt="Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 sensor size comparison"
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d80c0/d80c0d39b1177235f37dc2f2d8f6b9bdb1f19983" alt="Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A495 vs FujiFilm AX350 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | FujiFilm FinePix AX350 |
Otherwise known as | - | FinePix AX355 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3440 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 33-165mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 images |
Battery format | - | AA |
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $109 | $0 |