Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is pretty similar but the A495 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A495 was revealed 9 months after the Fujifilm F200EXR and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A495 grades against the Fujifilm F200EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 and Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery and Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| A495 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | April 2009 | Newer by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm F200EXR | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| A495 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 provides physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the A495 compared to the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 93 and 93 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The A495 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Fujifilm F200EXR will offer you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher A495 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $109 | $350 |