Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
![Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A495/Canon-A495-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR/Fujifilm-F600-EXR-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Canon A495 versus Fujifilm F600 EXR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm F600 EXR (16MP) and the A495 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F600 EXR (1/2") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The A495 was launched 19 months earlier than the Fujifilm F600 EXR which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A495 scores vs the Fujifilm F600 EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 and Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery and Fujifilm F600 EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm F600 EXR
A495 | Fujifilm F600 EXR |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F600 EXR over the Canon A495
Fujifilm F600 EXR | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm F600 EXR
A495 | Fujifilm F600 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 provides external dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F600 EXR has measurements of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Canon A495 versus Fujifilm F600 EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A495 vs the Fujifilm F600 EXR.
![Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR size comparison Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and Fujifilm F600 EXR is 93 and 91 respectively.
![Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Fujifilm F600 EXR.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The A495 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F600 EXR will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged A495 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A495-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-F600-EXR-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2011-08-11 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (FHD 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (HD 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), High Speed Movie (80 / 160 / 320 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVI MPEG4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 153 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $109 | $230 |