Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) and the A495 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A495 was revealed 24 months before the Fujifilm F750EXR making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the A495 matches up vs the Fujifilm F750EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR. The full galleries are available at Canon A495 Gallery & Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Fujifilm F750EXR
| A495 | Fujifilm F750EXR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Canon A495
| Fujifilm F750EXR | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Fujifilm F750EXR
| A495 | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 offers physical dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Fujifilm F750EXR has measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 compared to the Fujifilm F750EXR.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and Fujifilm F750EXR is 93 and 90 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and Fujifilm F750EXR.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The A495 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Fujifilm F750EXR will deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A495 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A495 | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 234 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $109 | $445 |