Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced November 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-510
- Older Model is Olympus E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ100
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-510 (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-510 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-510 was launched 5 years prior to the FZ200 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-510 grades vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-510 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-510 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-510 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-510
FZ200 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | November 2007 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Panasonic FZ200
E-510 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-510 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-510 against the FZ200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-510 and FZ200 is 69 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-510 and FZ200.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-510 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ200 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older E-510 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-510 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-510 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-510 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2007-11-23 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 490 gr (1.08 pounds) | 588 gr (1.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 52 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 442 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 540 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $550 | $499 |