Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Released August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Canon A495 and Nikon S8200, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Nikon. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and S8200 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A495 was introduced 19 months earlier than the S8200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the A495 grades against the S8200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A495 & Nikon Coolpix S8200. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon A495 Gallery & Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Nikon S8200
| A495 | S8200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Canon A495
| S8200 | A495 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 19 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 961k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+846k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Nikon S8200
| A495 | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 offers physical measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Nikon S8200 has dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Canon A495 and Nikon S8200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the A495 compared to the S8200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A495 and S8200 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and S8200.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Nikon S8200 to give extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older A495 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon A495 vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 961 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lb) | 213 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $109 | $329 |