Clicky

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Olympus VH-410 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
34
Overall
37

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Canon A495 versus Olympus VH-410, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The A495 was launched 3 years prior to the VH-410 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the A495 matches up vs the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Olympus VH-410

 A495 VH-410 

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Canon A495

 VH-410 A495 
IntroducedAugust 2012January 2010More recent by 31 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k115kCrisper display (+345k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Canon A495 and Olympus VH-410

 A495 VH-410 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon A495 comes with external measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Canon A495 versus Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the A495 compared to the VH-410.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A495 and VH-410 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A495 and VH-410.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VH-410 to render extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older A495 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography advice
Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography advice
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Street photography highlights
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports focus via touch
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A495
Sports photography with Olympus VH-410
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography details
Olympus VH-410 Travel photography details
50
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
68
supports focus via touch
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography info
Olympus VH-410 Landscape photography info
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny screen (2.5")
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
43
really wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Olympus VH-410 Vlogging info
21
wide angle not great (37mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone socket
32
really wide (26mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon A495 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Olympus VH-410
 Canon PowerShot A495Olympus VH-410
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A495 Olympus VH-410
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2010-01-05 2012-08-21
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-122mm (3.3x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 115k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175g (0.39 lbs) 152g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $109 $186