Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35
93 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbde0/bbde0b2c449374bbe735730425e6fe0e1983d8cd" alt="Canon PowerShot A495 front Canon PowerShot A495 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Successor is Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The A495 was released 5 years before the ZS35 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the A495 matches up against the ZS35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A495 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A495 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Panasonic ZS35
A495 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Canon A495
ZS35 | A495 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A495 and Panasonic ZS35
A495 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon A495 provides exterior dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the A495 versus the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6ffd/d6ffda9dc9c48ab62d55a92119a1bae4fcb7a93c" alt="Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and ZS35 is 93 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a40e0/a40e0904ee48f9a1b86dc3776084e0a8f89268fa" alt="Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A495 and ZS35.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Panasonic ZS35 to show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older A495 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84ce2/84ce254fe9b0f1664a64870c0ba9cc9a886bde8e" alt="Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2310b/2310b376afa9e54a714f134892bd78ad641b8a5a" alt="Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon A495 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A495 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Panasonic |
Model | Canon PowerShot A495 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-122mm (3.3x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $109 | $300 |