Clicky

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2010
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Below is a in depth assessment of the Canon A495 versus Ricoh CX4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the A495 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The A495 was revealed 7 months earlier than the CX4 so they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the A495 scores against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Ricoh CX4

 A495 CX4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Canon A495

 CX4 A495 
AnnouncedAugust 2010January 2010More recent by 7 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k115kSharper display (+805k dot)

Common features in the Canon A495 and Ricoh CX4

 A495 CX4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Canon A495 has got outer measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Examine the Canon A495 versus Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the A495 against the CX4.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A495 and CX4 is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A495 and CX4.

To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of files although you would want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older A495 will be behind in sensor tech.

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon A495
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
27
you can focus manually
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon A495
Street photography with Ricoh CX4
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography info
16
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon A495 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography highlights
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than others (205g)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography advice
22
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging features
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging features
21
wide angle not fantastic (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A495 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Ricoh CX4
 Canon PowerShot A495Ricoh CX4
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-01-05 2010-08-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 115k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 205 gr (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $109 $211