Clicky

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23
Canon PowerShot A495 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Canon A495
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 175g - 94 x 62 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Canon A495 and Samsung WB800F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the A495 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The A495 was released 4 years before the WB800F which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the A495 matches up against the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A495 over the Samsung WB800F

 A495 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon A495

 WB800F A495 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2010More modern by 36 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k115kClearer screen (+345k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Canon A495 and Samsung WB800F

 A495 WB800F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A495 provides outside dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Canon A495 and Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the A495 and the WB800F.

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A495 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The picture below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A495 and WB800F.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB800F to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged A495 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A495 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography info
19
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
44
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon A495 Street photography information
Samsung WB800F Street photography information
46
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon A495 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
16
max frames per second low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon A495
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competition (218 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon A495 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography info
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
50
has manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A495 Vlogging info
Samsung WB800F Vlogging info
21
wide angle not good (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
35
rather wide (23mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Canon A495 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A495 and Samsung WB800F
 Canon PowerShot A495Samsung WB800F
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Samsung
Model Canon PowerShot A495 Samsung WB800F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-01-05 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 218 gr (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 94 x 62 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom, Face) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $109 $300