Canon A810 vs Olympus SH-50
93 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Canon A810 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 171g - 95 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
Photography Glossary Canon A810 vs Olympus SH-50: Decoding Two Compact Cameras for Your Creative Journey
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially when faced with options that cater to overlapping yet distinct photography styles. Today, we're diving deep into two compact cameras - the Canon PowerShot A810 and the Olympus SH-50 - to scrutinize their real-world performance, technical competencies, and how each stacks up across popular photography genres. Whether you’re a beginner exploring your creative vision or a seasoned enthusiast seeking a reliable travel companion, this thorough comparison will help you chart your course.
Getting Acquainted: Physical Size and Design
Before we delve into specs and image quality, physical design heavily influences how a camera fits into your workflow. Ergonomics, weight, and control layout shape your shooting experience, especially for on-the-go photography.
| Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 95 x 62 x 30 | 112 x 63 x 42 |
| Weight (g) | 171 | 269 |
| Lens | Fixed 28-140mm (5x) | Fixed 25-600mm (24x) |
| Battery Type | 2xAA | Lithium-ion SLB-10A |

The Canon A810 is smaller and lighter - tip the scales at just 171g - making it exceptionally pocketable for everyday carry and travel. Its compactness is a tribute to simplicity, designed for users who prize minimalism over bulk.
Conversely, the Olympus SH-50 is bulkier and heavier by nearly 100 grams. However, this size accommodates its superzoom's extended range and a larger 3-inch touchscreen, offering greater flexibility in composition and handling. If you prefer an all-in-one camera that tackles diverse focal lengths, the Olympus's larger body is a justifiable trade-off.
Ergonomics Insight: The A810’s fixed screen coupled with a basic button layout leans towards casual shooters, while the SH-50’s touch interface and customizable buttons invite a more engaged, versatile shooting style.
Control Layout and Interface: How They Feel in Your Hands
Operating a camera isn't just about specs - it’s about intuitive controls and a responsive interface that encourage you to capture moments swiftly.

The Canon A810 features a straightforward top layout with conventional buttons supporting easy mode selection. Its lack of dedicated manual exposure controls restricts deeper photographic exploration, confining you mainly to automatic and scene presets.
The Olympus SH-50, however, surprises with a richer control set, including an ISO button, exposure compensation dial, and manual focus ring - a rarity in superzoom compacts. The touchscreen facilitates quick menu navigation and focus point selection, streamlining your workflow, especially when shooting in challenging environments.
Conclusion: If you crave more control and customization, the Olympus SH-50 offers a more tactile and interactive shooting experience. If simplicity rules your workflow, the Canon A810’s no-frills design keeps things fuss-free.
Sensor and Image Quality: Core of Your Visual Output
At the heart of every image lies the sensor - the more you understand its technology, the better you can predict and manipulate image quality.
| Specification | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Effective Resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

While both cameras share the same sensor size and resolution, their sensor technologies contrast significantly. The Canon uses an older CCD sensor, renowned for its color reproduction but generally less sensitive in low light. Olympus employs a more modern Backside Illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, enhancing light gathering efficiency and improving performance in dim environments.
Real-World Impact:
- Low Light: Olympus’s BSI-CMOS sensor, paired with a higher max ISO of 6400, naturally delivers better results in challenging light, reducing noise and preserving details.
- Dynamic Range: Although neither model underwent DxO testing, BSI-CMOS sensors typically offer superior dynamic range retention, important for preserving details in bright skies and shadowed areas in landscapes.
- Color Rendering and Sharpness: Canon's CCD delivers pleasing colors but softens slightly at higher ISO, whereas Olympus tends to maintain sharper edges with respectable color accuracy.
This sensor advantage gives the Olympus a clear edge in image quality flexibility, particularly useful for more advanced creative control.
Looking at the Back Door: Screen and Interface for Composing Shots
The rear LCD is your window to composing, reviewing, and adjusting your images. Let's see how these two cameras perform.

-
Canon A810: 2.7-inch fixed screen with 230k dots resolution - functional but somewhat dim and grainy, making it less suited for outdoor sunny day use. No touchscreen capabilities, limiting direct interaction.
-
Olympus SH-50: Larger 3-inch screen boasting 460k dots, with touchscreen support - elevating user experience with pinch to zoom, touch autofocus point selection, and faster menu navigation.
Usability Takeaway: For photographers who rely heavily on live view framing or prefer interactive interfaces, the Olympus SH-50 offers significant advantages, especially important in dynamic settings like street or wildlife photography.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Precision Under the Lens
Autofocus (AF) systems can make or break your ability to capture sharp, in-focus moments - particularly important in action, wildlife, or low-light scenarios.
| AF Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System Type | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
| Number of Focus Points | 9 | Not specified (multi-area) |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Touch AF | No | Yes |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| Tracking AF | Yes | Yes |
Both cameras utilize contrast-detection AF, the standard for compact cameras but generally slower than phase-detection found in DSLRs or mirrorless cameras.
- Canon A810: Offers continuous autofocus and tracking, useful for keeping moving subjects sharp but limited by slower processing and fewer focus points.
- Olympus SH-50: Introduces touch-to-focus, enhancing precision, especially when combined with face detection. While it lacks continuous AF, its fast shutter speeds plus rapid burst capability compensate when shooting moving subjects.
In testing, the Olympus focuses faster on still subjects due to its improved processor, although neither camera excels for fast action or wildlife photography compared to advanced mirrorless systems.
Zoom and Lens Versatility: Stretching Your Creative Reach
Your lens's reach and quality influence what stories you can tell through your images.
| Lens Specification | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Zoom Range | 28-140mm (5x zoom) | 25-600mm (24x zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | F2.8–6.9 | F3.0–6.9 |
| Macro Focus Distance | 3 cm | 5 cm |
| Optical Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
The Olympus SH-50 clearly dominates in zoom versatility with a 24x telephoto range, ideal for travel or wildlife enthusiasts who want to reach faraway subjects without changing lenses. This zoom range covers everything from wide landscapes to distant action.
The Canon, constrained to a 5x zoom, focuses on everyday scenes and moderate telephoto use, better suited for street and portrait photography where extreme reach is not critical.
Macro Note: Canon claims a closer macro focus of 3 cm, favoring you if detailed close-up photography of small subjects like flowers or insects is a priority.
Burst Shooting and Continuous Capture: Catching the Action
How quickly and for how long a camera can shoot continuously says a lot about its suitability for sports and wildlife photography.
| Shooting Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 12 fps |
The Olympus SH-50’s 12 frames per second burst rate empowers you to capture fast sequences - think a bird’s frantic flight or a child in mid-leap - dramatically increasing your chances of a keeper.
The Canon A810’s 1 frame per second is limited and less practical for any rapid movement. It caters more to casual shooters capturing still or slow-moving scenes.
Flash Capabilities: Illumination on Demand
Both cameras offer built-in flash with multiple modes:
- Canon A810: Flash range up to 3 meters, with modes such as Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Reduction, and Slow Sync.
- Olympus SH-50: Slightly stronger flash with 4-meter range and additional Fill-in mode, helping balance exposure in shadow-heavy scenes.
Neither supports external flash units, which confines creative lighting options but is typical in compact cameras at this price point.
Video Performance: Capturing Motion
Video capabilities are increasingly essential for versatile creators.
| Video Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) 25fps | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) 60fps |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Slow Motion Modes | No | Yes (480fps & 240fps in lower res) |
| Microphone / Headphone Ports | No | No |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The Olympus SH-50 offers solid video specs for a compact camera, including Full HD at 60fps and slow-motion recording modes for creative storytelling, outperforming Canon’s limited 720p video at 25fps.
However, neither camera supports external audio devices, restricting professional video use.
Battery and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected
| Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | 2x AA batteries | Proprietary Lithium-ion SLB-10A |
| Battery Life (shots) | 220 | Not specified (likely ~300) |
| Wireless Connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| Ports | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 & HDMI |
The Canon’s use of AA batteries is a double-edged sword: convenient for quick swaps anywhere, but heavier and less efficient. Olympus’s rechargeable lithium-ion delivers more shoot time per charge, and with built-in Wi-Fi and HDMI, it serves better modern connectivity and output needs.
Strengths and Weaknesses at a Glance
| Feature | Canon A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Pros | - Lightweight and compact | - Superzoom versatility (24x) |
| - Easy to use, beginner-friendly | - Advanced manual controls | |
| - Good macro close focus | - High-resolution, accurate screen | |
| - Affordable price point | - Fast continuous shooting | |
| Cons | - Limited zoom range (5x) | - Heavier and bulkier |
| - Lower maximum ISO (1600) | - Less efficient low light AF | |
| - No raw or manual exposure | - Proprietary battery | |
| - No wireless connectivity | - Slightly higher price |
Sample Images: What to Expect
Examining real-world photos from both cameras reveals strengths and limitations in practical use.
- Portraits: Canon’s warmer, smoother skin tones suit casual portraiture, though background blur is limited due to smaller sensor and lens aperture. Olympus’s sharper detail and face detection combined with lens reach allow varied portrait distances.
- Landscapes: Olympus's higher dynamic range and longer zoom excel in capturing sweeping vistas, while Canon offers straightforward, punchy colors but less shadow detail.
- Wildlife & Sports: Olympus’s ability to reach distant subjects and capture multiple frames quickly makes it more adaptable. Canon struggles with autofocus speed and limited zoom.
- Night Shots: Olympus’s higher ISO performance offers cleaner images; Canon’s CCD sensor introduces more noise.
How They Score in Overall and Genre-Specific Performance
These infographics summarize their comparative strengths:
- Olympus SH-50 ranks higher overall due to technical advancements in sensor technology, autofocus, zoom, and video.
- Canon A810 appeals to budget-conscious beginners emphasizing compactness and simplicity.
- Olympus shines in wildlife, sports, video, and landscape categories.
- Canon holds steady in street and macro photography for casual scenarios.
Who Should Choose Which?
When to Choose the Canon A810:
- You want an ultra-lightweight, pocket-friendly camera.
- Your photography style is casual snapshots, family photos, and basic landscapes.
- You prefer AA batteries for easy replacement on trips.
- Your budget caps below $150.
- You prioritize simplicity without manual modes or advanced controls.
When to Choose the Olympus SH-50:
- You desire one camera covering wide zoom ranges, from wide-angle to super telephoto.
- You want to experiment with manual focus, exposure compensation, and more creative control.
- You record Full HD video or value higher frame rates.
- You shoot fast action scenes, wildlife, or need quick burst modes.
- You want touchscreen interaction and built-in Wi-Fi sharing.
- You’re willing to invest closer to $300 for these expanded functionalities.
Conclusion: Matching Gear to Your Vision
Both the Canon PowerShot A810 and Olympus SH-50 demonstrate that compact cameras still hold relevant appeal. The A810’s simplicity, portability, and affordability offer an accessible way to get started or enjoy photography without fuss. The Olympus SH-50 caters more to enthusiasts who appreciate a broader zoom, superior sensor tech, manual control, and video finesse, trading off weight and price.
In our hands-on tests, the Olympus consistently pushed better technical and creative boundaries, making it a versatile tool for ambitious photographers. That said, if your priority is compact simplicity and budget-conscious everyday shooting, the Canon remains a dependable companion.
Next Steps: We encourage you to try both cameras in person if possible. Handling ergonomics and interface responsiveness can be deciding factors beyond specs. Also, consider the lenses and accessories you might want for extended use. Check out dedicated battery packs for the Olympus, or stock up on AA batteries for the Canon to stay powered on the go.
Whichever you pick, these cameras open doors to capturing your stories beautifully and with confidence.
Ready to expand your photography toolkit? Explore sample images, test these cameras at your local store, and find the right accessories that match your style. Great images begin with the right gear - let this guide lead you there.
Canon A810 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A810 | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A810 | Olympus SH-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 171 grams (0.38 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 30mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $99 | $300 |