Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35
96 Imaging
40 Features
26 Overall
34
![Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-135/Canon-ELPH-135-front.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 127g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Released February 2014
- Also referred to as IXUS 145
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Casio. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 135 (16MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The ELPH 135 was launched 4 years after the EX-Z35 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 135 scores versus the EX-Z35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 135 Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 135 over the Casio EX-Z35
ELPH 135 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 49 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon ELPH 135
EX-Z35 | ELPH 135 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio EX-Z35
ELPH 135 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 135 offers outside dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 127 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 135 and Casio EX-Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 135 compared to the EX-Z35.
![Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-135-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 135 and EX-Z35 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-135-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specs. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the ELPH 135 and EX-Z35.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Canon ELPH 135 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The younger ELPH 135 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
![Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-135-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-135-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon ELPH 135 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Also called as | IXUS 145 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-12 | 2010-02-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4+ | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 127g (0.28 lb) | 124g (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $119 | $99 |