Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
45 Features
21 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20def/20def830b1cda132d412dd4d5147ac2e0ad78d5a" alt="Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS front Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/580aa/580aa8066e7f6a587d8495dc4afcf7f471af7c1b" alt="Samsung SL620 front Samsung SL620 front"
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 142g - 95 x 57 x 24mm
- Released February 2014
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 155
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Canon ELPH 150 IS versus Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 150 IS (20MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The ELPH 150 IS was revealed 5 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the ELPH 150 IS grades vs the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 150 IS Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 150 IS over the Samsung SL620
ELPH 150 IS | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Canon ELPH 150 IS
SL620 | ELPH 150 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon ELPH 150 IS and Samsung SL620
ELPH 150 IS | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 150 IS has got external measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon ELPH 150 IS versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 150 IS against the SL620.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9753c/9753c5185224ebae3a62b3c45d4b9ec15b5ad1e9" alt="Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 size comparison Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 150 IS and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3bc7/a3bc7ce52fef4323e21c96a6343bc898b1647365" alt="Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison"
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 150 IS and SL620.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Canon ELPH 150 IS to produce more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent ELPH 150 IS will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dd99/7dd99917beaff3c951a64170977d5b94668b93a0" alt="Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison"
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3915b/3915bca42ee8aabeb42ae41442e5d08227cf4fe6" alt="Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon ELPH 150 IS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 150 IS | Samsung SL620 |
Also called | IXUS 155 | PL65 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-12 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, off, slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142g (0.31 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $149 | $200 |