Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870
Portability
95 Imaging
40 Features
39 Overall
39
95 Imaging
40 Features
39 Overall
39
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 340 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 265 HS
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 340 HS (16MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe ELPH 340 HS was manufactured 24 months prior to the TG-870 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the ELPH 340 HS matches up against the TG-870 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 340 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 340 HS over the Olympus TG-870
| ELPH 340 HS | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Canon ELPH 340 HS
| TG-870 | ELPH 340 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 340 HS and Olympus TG-870
| ELPH 340 HS | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon ELPH 340 HS enjoys physical measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 340 HS and the TG-870.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 340 HS and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The picture here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 340 HS and TG-870.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images however you may want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged ELPH 340 HS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 340 HS Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography information
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
MP count decent (16MP)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 340 HS Street photography details
Olympus TG-870 Street photography details
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than average (221g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 340 HS Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography factors
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
bad battery life (190 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
better than average battery life (300 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon ELPH 340 HS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-870
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
bad battery life (190 shots)
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.6)
better than average battery life (300 CIPA)
environment proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (21mm)
heavier than average (221g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon ELPH 340 HS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-870
has manual focus
decently wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery life (190 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
pretty wide (21mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment proof
better than average battery life (300 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon ELPH 340 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-870
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1280 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.6)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
pretty wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of mic support
heavier than average (221 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Also called as | IXUS 265 HS | - |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1280 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 147g (0.32 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11LH | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $199 | $280 |