Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-330 was announced 9 years prior to the TG-3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-330 scores against the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-3
| E-330 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-330
| TG-3 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 97 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-3
| E-330 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 features outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the TG-3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and TG-3 is 65 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-3 will show extra detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $350 |