Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-330 was announced 9 years prior to the TG-3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-330 scores against the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus TG-3
| E-330 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-330
| TG-3 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 | March 2006 | More modern by 97 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 215k | Sharper screen (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus TG-3
| E-330 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 features outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 against the TG-3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and TG-3 is 65 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-3 will show extra detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 215k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $350 |