Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
40 Features
39 Overall
39
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1280 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 22mm
- Announced January 2014
- Also Known as IXUS 265 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon ELPH 340 HS versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 340 HS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe ELPH 340 HS was unveiled 4 years after the T900 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the ELPH 340 HS grades vs the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 340 HS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 340 HS over the Sony T900
| ELPH 340 HS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 60 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Canon ELPH 340 HS
| T900 | ELPH 340 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 340 HS and Sony T900
| ELPH 340 HS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon ELPH 340 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Canon ELPH 340 HS versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 340 HS versus the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 340 HS and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 340 HS and T900.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Canon ELPH 340 HS to produce more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The newer ELPH 340 HS is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Other name | IXUS 265 HS | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1280 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1280 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 147 gr (0.32 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $199 | $300 |