Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
45 Features
39 Overall
42
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.6-7.0) lens
- 147g - 100 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Also Known as IXUS 275 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the ELPH 350 HS (20MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe ELPH 350 HS was revealed 6 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the ELPH 350 HS grades against the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Canon ELPH 350 HS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 350 HS over the Sony T900
ELPH 350 HS | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Canon ELPH 350 HS
T900 | ELPH 350 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Sony T900
ELPH 350 HS | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 350 HS has got outside dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Canon ELPH 350 HS and Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the ELPH 350 HS compared to the T900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 350 HS and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 350 HS and T900.
Plainly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Canon ELPH 350 HS to provide greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The younger ELPH 350 HS provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 350 HS vs Sony T900 Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 350 HS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Also Known as | IXUS 275 HS | - |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.6-7.0 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.5 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, slow synchro, flash off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 147g (0.32 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-11LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $219 | $300 |