Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Other Name is IXUS 510 HS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Launched January 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm HS30EXR
- New Model is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the ELPH 530 HS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") boast different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe ELPH 530 HS was unveiled 11 months prior to the Fujifilm HS35EXR which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon ELPH 530 HS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the ELPH 530 HS scores vs the Fujifilm HS35EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
Fujifilm HS35EXR | ELPH 530 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 11 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR
ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS enjoys exterior dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Fujifilm HS35EXR has measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") along with a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs).
Contrast the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the ELPH 530 HS and the Fujifilm HS35EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR is 95 and 59 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 530 HS and Fujifilm HS35EXR.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The ELPH 530 HS using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Fujifilm HS35EXR will offer greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older ELPH 530 HS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Fujifilm HS35EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR |
Alternate name | IXUS 510 HS | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 5 | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.50 m | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lb) | 687 grams (1.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 photos | 600 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-9L | NP-W126 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $250 | $380 |