Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
- Also referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe ELPH 530 HS was unveiled 3 years earlier than the TG-3 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the ELPH 530 HS scores against the TG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Olympus TG-3
| ELPH 530 HS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| TG-3 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 26 months |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus TG-3
| ELPH 530 HS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS enjoys outside dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the ELPH 530 HS against the TG-3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the ELPH 530 HS and TG-3 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 530 HS and TG-3.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged ELPH 530 HS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-3
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
good megapixels (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-3 Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch focus
lighter than competition (163g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than average (247 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (190 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
great battery life (330 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Travel photography with Olympus TG-3
lighter than competition (163 grams)
features touch focus
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (336mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
bad battery life (190 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
great battery life (330 shots)
environment proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average (247g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Landscape photography camera
really wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.2")
image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual mode not available
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery life (190 per charge)
missing Time Lapse recording
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment proof
great battery life (330 shots)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-3
really wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (163g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing mic port
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than average (247 grams)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Alternate name | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 5 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163g (0.36 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-9L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $250 | $350 |
