Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
- Additionally Known as IXUS 510 HS
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe ELPH 530 HS was launched 5 months prior to the FZ200 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon ELPH 530 HS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the ELPH 530 HS matches up vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Panasonic FZ200
| ELPH 530 HS | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| FZ200 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Panasonic FZ200
| ELPH 530 HS | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 |  | July 2012 | Same age |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS enjoys outside measurements of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the ELPH 530 HS vs the FZ200.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the ELPH 530 HS and FZ200 is 95 and 65 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through technical specs. The picture below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the ELPH 530 HS and FZ200.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Panasonic FZ200 to produce more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Portrait photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography features
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch to focus
lighter than competitors in class (163g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (190 CIPA)
has no phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
great battery power (540 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography highlights
lighter than competitors in class (163 grams)
features touch to focus
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long reach (336mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (190 shots)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.4)
great battery power (540 per charge)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (588g)
MP count low (12MP)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Landscape photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography features
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3.2")
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery power (190 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (540 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Vlogging with Panasonic FZ200
fairly wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (163g)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have mic jack
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external mic support
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than others in class (588g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Also Known as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-07-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 5 | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.50 m | 13.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lbs) | 588 grams (1.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photographs | 540 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $499 |