Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4c8/ce4c8a213d62e15738ce4ed22b0c5b5c77239af7" alt="Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efead/efeadc926fa641dfb6c25e82a731918fb19ebb47" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front"
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Superseded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Announced August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and EX-Z280 (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and EX-Z280 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The G9 X II was revealed 7 years after the EX-Z280 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the G9 X II matches up versus the EX-Z280 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Casio Exilim EX-Z280. The full galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Casio EX-Z280 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Casio EX-Z280
G9 X II | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2017 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 90 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+925k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Canon G9 X II
EX-Z280 | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Casio EX-Z280
G9 X II | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon G9 X II has outer measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z280 has specifications of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the G9 X II vs the EX-Z280.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c688e/c688e8aa0f486de3698f73b2f9334f74e9cf88c1" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X II and EX-Z280 is 92 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c41d/1c41d7226c85d410ffb966a24c9f6b35f16d5208" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 top view buttons comparison Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 top view buttons comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the G9 X II and EX-Z280.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Canon G9 X II will deliver greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd5c8/dd5c867f8aab378ac0b5857c53aca89d00796625" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 sensor size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 sensor size comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1020/c10205db071527d7cf95a6396299d4424c6a21b2" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Casio EX-Z280 Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2009-08-31 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.2fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | NP-80 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $530 | $180 |