Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Previous Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Canon G9 X II and Fujifilm F200EXR, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe G9 X II was unveiled 7 years after the Fujifilm F200EXR which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the G9 X II grades against the Fujifilm F200EXR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| G9 X II | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2017 | April 2009 | Newer by 94 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Canon G9 X II
| Fujifilm F200EXR | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Fujifilm F200EXR
| G9 X II | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Canon G9 X II and Fujifilm F200EXR in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the G9 X II vs the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and Fujifilm F200EXR is 92 and 93 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon G9 X II will deliver extra detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern G9 X II provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon G9 X II vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $530 | $350 |