Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced January 2017
- Previous Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Canon G9 X II and Kodak C140, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and C140 (8MP) and the G9 X II (1") and C140 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe G9 X II was manufactured 8 years after the C140 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the G9 X II scores versus the C140 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Kodak EasyShare C140. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Kodak C140
| G9 X II | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2017 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 98 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon G9 X II
| C140 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Kodak C140
| G9 X II | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Canon G9 X II enjoys external measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak C140 has sizing of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Kodak C140 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the G9 X II and the C140.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and C140 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the G9 X II and C140.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Canon G9 X II will offer greater detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger G9 X II will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon G9 X II vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2017-01-04 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 8MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 13cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 160 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $530 | $80 |