Canon G9 X II vs Leica X2
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57


83 Imaging
56 Features
37 Overall
48
Canon G9 X II vs Leica X2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Earlier Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12500
- No Video
- 36mm (F2.8) lens
- 345g - 124 x 69 x 52mm
- Launched May 2012
- Old Model is Leica X1
- Updated by Leica X Vario

Canon G9 X Mark II vs Leica X2: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera boils down to understanding how each model performs in real-world scenarios - across genres like portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, and more. Today I’ll compare two large sensor compact cameras aimed at enthusiasts who crave excellent image quality in portable bodies: the Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and the Leica X2. Each has its niche, strengths, and compromises. Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and industry-standard evaluation methods, this side-by-side review will unpack their capabilities, guiding you to the camera best suited for your style and budget.
Seeing the Physical Difference: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
The Canon G9 X II and Leica X2 are both large sensor compacts, designed for portability with image quality exceeding most point-and-shoots. However, their footprint and ergonomics diverge noticeably.
-
Canon G9 X II: Measuring 98x58x31mm and weighing a mere 206g, it’s a true pocketable powerhouse. Its slim profile fits easily in a jacket pocket, making it ideal for grab-and-go shooting days or vacations where minimal weight matters.
-
Leica X2: The body is considerably larger at 124x69x52mm, weighing 345g. Its heft telegraphs a more substantial build - typical Leica construction - lending excellent grip but limiting true pocketability. It feels more like a DSLR or mirrorless in hand rather than a slim compact.
Ergonomics & Controls:
The Canon relies on a touchscreen interface with fewer physical buttons but still offers key exposure controls and manual focus. The Leica X2 features more traditional dial and button placement (though with no touchscreen), targeting photographers who prefer a classic manual feel, emphasizing deliberate composing and shooting without touchscreen distractions.
In practice, I found the G9 X II perfect for quick candid shots and street explorations, while the Leica invites slower, more intentional shooting sessions - something to consider depending on your shooting rhythm.
Design Details Up Close: Top Controls and User Interface
Looking at the control layouts reveals design philosophies working in tandem with each camera’s target user.
-
Canon G9 X II features minimalist top dials: a mode dial, shutter button, and a zoom lever integrated around the shutter. It includes a small built-in flash and lacks an external flash shoe, reflecting its compact focus.
-
Leica X2 offers more manual control with dedicated exposure compensation dial on top, shutter speed dial, and a traditional command dial, aligning with Leica’s ethos of tactile precision. Its built-in flash supports multiple modes and is complemented by an accessory flash shoe for off-camera lighting setups.
These physical controls augment the Leica’s appeal to advanced enthusiasts who prioritize direct manual input over touchscreen menus. The Canon, on the other hand, leans into touchscreen convenience and simplified operation, making it approachable for enthusiasts who want control but also ease of use.
Sensor Technology and Raw Imaging Power
At the heart of any camera is its sensor, and the contrast here is significant:
Specification | Canon G9 X II | Leica X2 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1" BSI-CMOS (13.2 x 8.8 mm) | APS-C CMOS (23.6 x 15.8 mm) |
Sensor Area | 116.16 mm² | 372.88 mm² |
Resolution | 20 Megapixels | 16 Megapixels |
Max ISO | 12800 | 12500 |
RAW Support | Yes | Yes |
Anti-Alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Technical Analysis:
The Leica’s APS-C sensor is over three times larger in area than Canon’s 1-inch type sensor. Larger sensor size typically equates to improved image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range. The Leica’s 16MP resolution is slightly lower than Canon’s 20MP, but pixel pitch is larger, generally offering better noise control and tonal gradation.
In practical lab tests, the Leica’s images exhibit superior color depth, smoother gradations, and better high-ISO performance, especially above ISO 800. Canon’s newer DIGIC 7 processor contributes to good noise reduction and sharpness, though it cannot fully compensate for the smaller sensor’s limitations.
The Canon also includes an anti-aliasing filter, common in compact cameras to reduce moiré effects, while Leica maintains it for smoother detail rendition.
For shoots demanding high image fidelity, subtle tonal control, and low-light latitude (e.g., landscapes, portraits), the Leica X2’s sensor is the stronger choice. But the Canon G9 X II offers excellent quality for a compact camera with great detail resolution at base ISO.
Viewing and Composing: LCD and Viewfinder Comparison
Neither camera sports a traditional integrated viewfinder, which is a drawback for some photographers.
-
Canon G9 X II has a 3-inch fixed touchscreen with 1040k-dot resolution - a bright, sharp display that supports touch focus and intuitive menu navigation.
-
Leica X2 offers a smaller 2.7-inch fixed LCD with only 230k-dot resolution and no touch function. It’s functional but basic.
Notably, the Leica provides an optional electronic viewfinder (sold separately), while the Canon has no viewfinder option. This means Leica users willing to invest in the EVF module get critical eye-level composition and a more stable shooting platform, particularly in bright light or slower shutter scenarios.
For street and travel photographers who adore discreet eye-level composition, the Leica’s optional EVF adds a valuable layer of utility. Meanwhile, the Canon’s touchscreen is superior in bright light usability and quick focusing, making it preferable for vloggers or casual shooters relying on live view.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
The autofocus system is vital for shooting action, portraits, and wildlife. Here’s how each camera measures up:
Feature | Canon G9 X II | Leica X2 |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast-detection (Touch & Tracking) | Contrast-detection |
AF Points | Multiple, touch-selectable | 11 fixed AF points |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Eye AF | No | No |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
The Canon’s updated DIGIC 7 enables faster and more reliable contrast-detection autofocus, with face detection and continuous AF tracking improvements. The G9 X II’s 8.2fps burst rate and responsive AF make it capable of capturing fleeting moments in street and casual wildlife photography.
The Leica X2, conversely, relies on an older contrast-detection system; autofocus speed and accuracy are notably slower. It doesn’t support continuous AF tracking, making it cumbersome for moving subjects but acceptable for still life, portraits, or landscapes.
My tests confirmed the Canon’s AF excels in speed and tracking reliability. If you often shoot children, pets, or spontaneous street scenes, the G9 X II offers more confidence to lock focus quickly. Leica users will need to anticipate shots and rely on manual focus finesse.
Lens Quality and Optical Versatility
Both cameras have fixed, non-interchangeable lenses, but they significantly differ in focal length and aperture:
Specification | Canon G9 X II | Leica X2 |
---|---|---|
Lens Focal Range | 28-84mm (3x zoom) | 36mm prime (fixed) |
Maximum Aperture | f/2.0 – f/4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 30 cm |
-
The Canon’s zoom lens offers flexibility from wide-angle (28mm equivalent) to short telephoto (84mm equivalent). This advantage makes the G9 X II multi-purpose, competent for landscapes, portraits, street, and casual telephoto shots.
-
The Leica’s prime 36mm lens is optimized for detail, sharpness, and optical quality. Leica optics are world-renowned for their rendering, contrast, and bokeh qualities. While the focal length is less versatile, its f/2.8 aperture delivers respectable low-light performance and attractive background separation.
In portraits, Leica’s lens produces creamy bokeh and excellent color rendition on skin tones, reflecting its heritage of prime lens excellence. Canon’s wider aperture at 28mm allows brighter exposures but the slower telephoto end limits portrait bokeh quality.
The Canon’s macro capability allows focusing as close as 5 cm, great for flowers and signs. Leica’s 30 cm minimum focus distance constrains close-up possibilities.
Image Quality and Real-World Performance Across Genres
Understanding how each performs by photography discipline:
Portrait Photography
- Leica X2: Excellent skin tone rendition thanks to larger sensor and rich color depth; smooth bokeh; precise face-detection AF.
- Canon G9 X II: Good skin tones with slightly more noise in low light; shallower bokeh at telephoto end but not as creamy.
Landscape Photography
- Leica X2: Larger sensor and prime lens yield higher dynamic range and detail; limited weather sealing but solid build; best in good light.
- Canon G9 X II: Good dynamic range for its class, versatile zoom useful for framing, but smaller sensor limits ultimate image quality.
Wildlife & Sports
- Canon G9 X II: Faster AF, 8.2fps burst capable of freezing motion; short telephoto lens somewhat limiting but usable.
- Leica X2: Slow AF and no continuous focus make action tough; better suited for static subjects.
Street Photography
- Canon G9 X II: Compact, discrete, quick to focus - excellent for candid shots.
- Leica X2: Larger and heavier, less discrete but offers outstanding optical quality for deliberate compositions.
Macro Photography
- Canon G9 X II: Stronger with close focusing down to 5 cm and image stabilization.
- Leica X2: Limited macro ability due to minimum focusing distance.
Night and Astrophotography
- Leica X2: Larger sensor aids low light; f/2.8 lens moderately bright.
- Canon G9 X II: Smaller sensor noise limits; f/2 lens helps but ISO noise becomes visible rapidly.
Video Capabilities
- Canon G9 X II: Full HD 1080p video at 60fps; optical image stabilization; no external mic input.
- Leica X2: No video recording feature.
Travel Photography
- Canon G9 X II: Lightweight, flexible zoom, wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth), decent battery life (~235 shots).
- Leica X2: Larger, heavier, no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, but longer battery life (~450 shots) and durable build.
Professional Work
- Leica X2: Larger files, superior image quality, and RAW support appeal to professionals needing effortless full-frame look in a compact; cachet of Leica brand also counts.
- Canon G9 X II: More consumer-oriented but RAW and manual controls allow for sophisticated shooting when needed.
Reliability, Build Quality, and Weather Resistance
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized against the elements, but Leica’s metal unibody exudes a more robust feel compared to Canon’s plastic-heavy construction. The Leica should withstand years of professional use better, though both require careful handling in adverse conditions.
Battery Life and Storage
- Canon G9 X II: Rated at 235 shots per charge; adequate for casual shooting; stores images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
- Leica X2: Impressive 450 shots per charge; uses SD/SDHC cards; no dual slots on either camera.
Battery life differences are significant in field use. I found the Leica more reliable for day-long sessions without swapping batteries, whereas Canon users should pack spares for extended trips.
Connectivity and Sharing
-
Canon G9 X II offers built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC for instant wireless sharing and remote control via smartphone apps. This suits modern shooters valuing quick social media uploads or remote triggering.
-
Leica X2 lacks any wireless features - a tradeoff for no-nonsense shooting and possibly better battery economy, but less convenient in today’s connected world.
Value for Money: Pricing and Who Should Buy
Camera | Price (Approximate) | Pros Summary | Ideal For |
---|---|---|---|
Canon G9 X Mark II | $530 | Compact, excellent touchscreen, decent zoom, good AF and video | Enthusiasts needing a versatile, pocketable travel camera with video |
Leica X2 | $990 | Superior image quality, prime lens, solid build, longer battery | Professionals or enthusiasts prioritizing image quality and manual controls over portability |
From a price-performance viewpoint, the Canon G9 X II offers remarkable value for its advanced features and flexibility. The Leica demands nearly double the price but rewards with richer images and higher build quality - an investment more suited for those who prioritize image perfection and the Leica experience over features like video and Wi-Fi.
Summary Scorecards: Overall and Genre-Specific Performance
These scorecards summarize the extensive testing results and subjective assessments. They reflect:
- Canon G9 X II scores higher in autofocus, video, portability, and versatility.
- Leica X2 excels in image quality, build, and battery life but lags in autofocus speed and features.
Sample Image Comparisons
Looking at real images from both cameras under controlled and natural lighting, the Leica files exhibit richer colors, better highlight retention, and a more organic bokeh. The Canon’s images are sharp and vibrant but show more noise and less subtle tonal gradation in shade and highlight transitions.
Final Thoughts: Choosing Between the Canon G9 X II and Leica X2
Why you can trust this review:
These insights are based on rigorous hands-on testing - including lab measures and field shooting across multiple genres - plus firsthand experience with image quality evaluation, autofocus timing, and battery endurance testing.
Choose the Canon G9 X Mark II if…
- You want a truly portable, pocket-ready camera that is quick to focus and shoot.
- You value versatile zoom range for landscapes, street, portrait, and casual telephoto.
- You need modern connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) and reliable Full HD video.
- You want excellent image quality within a modest budget.
- You prioritize touch controls and ease of use.
Choose the Leica X2 if…
- You demand superior image quality with a larger APS-C sensor and exceptional optics.
- You prefer traditional manual control dials, photography as a mindful craft over convenience.
- You want robust build quality and longer battery life for professional use.
- You don’t need video and can accept limited autofocus speed.
- You appreciate the Leica heritage and aesthetic in camera design.
In Closing
Both the Canon G9 X Mark II and Leica X2 offer compelling large sensor compact options, yet target distinct photographers. The Canon bridges advanced features with superb portability, well-suited for enthusiast travel, street, and family photography with video capabilities. The Leica serves discerning shooters who value image quality, manual controls, and a premium feel over convenience features.
As always, consider your shoot style, genre preferences, and budget before deciding. Whether you choose Canon’s traveling companion or Leica’s refined image-maker, you’re getting a capable camera that punches above its size, tailored to different creative visions.
For additional questions or personalized camera guidance, feel free to reach out - helping you make an informed and satisfying camera investment is our top priority.
Canon G9 X II vs Leica X2 Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Leica X2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Leica |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Leica X2 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2012-05-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12500 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 36mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 30cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.2fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync, Studio |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 345g (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 124 x 69 x 52mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 pictures | 450 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $530 | $994 |