Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
91 Imaging
38 Features
47 Overall
41
Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced January 2017
- Superseded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Canon G9 X II and Nikon S8200, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Nikon. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and S8200 (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and S8200 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe G9 X II was manufactured 5 years later than the S8200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the G9 X II grades versus the S8200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Nikon Coolpix S8200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Nikon S8200
| G9 X II | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | August 2011 | More recent by 66 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 961k | Sharper display (+79k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Canon G9 X II
| S8200 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Nikon S8200
| G9 X II | S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Canon G9 X II offers exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Nikon S8200 has specifications of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Nikon S8200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the G9 X II compared to the S8200.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and S8200 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The graphic here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and S8200.
Plainly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon G9 X II will result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher G9 X II should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon G9 X II vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2017-01-04 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 961k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 213g (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 images | 250 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $530 | $329 |