Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57


88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2013

Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-50, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and SH-50 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

The G9 X II was released 4 years after the SH-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the G9 X II grades versus the SH-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus SH-50. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus SH-50
G9 X II | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2017 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 49 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Canon G9 X II
SH-50 | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-50
G9 X II | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II has got external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the G9 X II compared to the SH-50.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and SH-50 is 92 and 88 respectively.

Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and SH-50.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X II featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon G9 X II will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher G9 X II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus SH-50 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 7 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $530 | $300 |