Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Succeeded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- New Model is Olympus SH-2
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-1, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and SH-1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe G9 X II was brought out 2 years later than the SH-1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the G9 X II matches up versus the SH-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus SH-1
| G9 X II | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | March 2014 | Fresher by 34 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Canon G9 X II
| SH-1 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-1
| G9 X II | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II has outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-1 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the G9 X II and the SH-1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and SH-1 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and SH-1.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The G9 X II due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Canon G9 X II will give more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern G9 X II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 7 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 271g (0.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photos | 380 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $530 | $349 |