Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the G9 X II (1") and 6020 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe G9 X II was unveiled 7 years later than the 6020 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the G9 X II grades versus the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus 6020
| G9 X II | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 85 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Canon G9 X II
| 6020 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020
| G9 X II | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the G9 X II against the 6020.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and 6020.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will give you greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer G9 X II should have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 7 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $530 | $279 |