Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the G9 X II (1") and 6020 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe G9 X II was unveiled 7 years later than the 6020 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the G9 X II grades versus the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus 6020
| G9 X II | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 85 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Canon G9 X II
| 6020 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020
| G9 X II | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II enjoys physical dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon G9 X II and Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the G9 X II against the 6020.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and 6020.
All in all, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will give you greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer G9 X II should have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 7 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $530 | $279 |