Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Superseded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G9 X II was revealed 3 years after the XZ-10 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the G9 X II grades versus the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus XZ-10
| G9 X II | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | January 2013 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Canon G9 X II
| XZ-10 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus XZ-10
| G9 X II | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II has outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has proportions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the G9 X II versus the XZ-10.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and XZ-10 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and XZ-10.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon G9 X II will deliver more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher G9 X II provides an edge in sensor tech.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.2 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 shots | 240 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $530 | $428 |