Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced January 2017
- Earlier Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-320, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the G9 X II (1") and TG-320 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe G9 X II was released 5 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the G9 X II matches up against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus TG-320
| G9 X II | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 | January 2012 | More recent by 61 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon G9 X II
| TG-320 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-320
| G9 X II | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II provides outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the G9 X II against the TG-320.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specs. The photograph below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and TG-320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Canon G9 X II will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher G9 X II provides an edge in sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2017-01-04 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | 150 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $530 | $0 |