Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4c8/ce4c8a213d62e15738ce4ed22b0c5b5c77239af7" alt="Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Old Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The G9 X II was launched 4 years later than the TG-830 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the G9 X II scores versus the TG-830 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
G9 X II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2017 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 49 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Canon G9 X II
TG-830 iHS | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-830 iHS
G9 X II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II has external measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the G9 X II vs the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f76ea/f76eaa124703b960accd43cdc4b050e1d1070512" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X II and TG-830 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fdb4/9fdb4bbea62c2173bf249edb1a2a9971752ebfb5" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The G9 X II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon G9 X II will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher G9 X II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/720fb/720fbbdc918070a75127950409143dc432cb1432" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a68a/2a68ac572e500cb42e6ffa91d92325bd8080535d" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.2 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 214g (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $530 | $0 |