Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4c8/ce4c8a213d62e15738ce4ed22b0c5b5c77239af7" alt="Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Older Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-5, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and TG-5 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The G9 X II was introduced 4 months earlier than the TG-5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the G9 X II matches up versus the TG-5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus TG-5
G9 X II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Canon G9 X II
TG-5 | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-5
G9 X II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2017 | ![]() | May 2017 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the G9 X II versus the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6edfe/6edfe84413386b9230ff74ace2b599569dea23fd" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X II and TG-5 is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a55a6/a55a678c5c725b8acf8d678d059869f393106e1f" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and TG-5.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Canon G9 X II will provide you with more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542d8/542d8d48c7078a3aad93b21ccdd2b0c9b21128fc" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa578/fa578de06e499b7e16a07a1df85cb9864a13630b" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 7 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.2fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 pictures | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $530 | $449 |