Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Superseded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Canon G9 X II and Olympus VR-340, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and VR-340 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe G9 X II was revealed 5 years later than the VR-340 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the G9 X II scores against the VR-340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus VR-340
| G9 X II | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 | January 2012 | Fresher by 61 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon G9 X II
| VR-340 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus VR-340
| G9 X II | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X II comes with outside dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Canon G9 X II and Olympus VR-340 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the G9 X II and the VR-340.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The photograph here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and VR-340.
All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The G9 X II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon G9 X II will give greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger G9 X II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus VR-340 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $530 | $130 |