Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") feature different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G9 X II was launched 4 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the G9 X II grades versus the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| G9 X II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2017 | December 2012 | More modern by 50 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon G9 X II
| XZ-2 iHS | G9 X II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| G9 X II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the G9 X II against the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon G9 X II will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger G9 X II provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2017-01-04 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 65 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 shots | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $530 | $450 |