Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
92 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Succeeded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ8
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Canon G9 X II and Panasonic ZS5, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and ZS5 (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and ZS5 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G9 X II was brought out 6 years later than the ZS5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the G9 X II grades vs the ZS5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5. The entire galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Panasonic ZS5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Panasonic ZS5
| G9 X II | ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | June 2010 | Fresher by 80 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS5 over the Canon G9 X II
| ZS5 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Panasonic ZS5
| G9 X II | ZS5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II has got outer measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS5 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Canon G9 X II and Panasonic ZS5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the G9 X II and the ZS5.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and ZS5 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and ZS5.
All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The G9 X II featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will give greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon G9 X II vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1300s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $530 | $300 |