Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Canon G9 X II and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and HZ35W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe G9 X II was manufactured 6 years after the HZ35W which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the G9 X II grades vs the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Samsung HZ35W
| G9 X II | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 80 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+426k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Canon G9 X II
| HZ35W | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Samsung HZ35W
| G9 X II | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II offers external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the G9 X II vs the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and HZ35W.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Canon G9 X II will give you more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger G9 X II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Samsung HZ35W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB650 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.2 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $530 | $300 |