Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Succeeded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon G9 X II and Samsung SL102, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the G9 X II (1") and SL102 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe G9 X II was manufactured 8 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the G9 X II matches up against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Samsung SL102
| G9 X II | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 98 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon G9 X II
| SL102 | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Samsung SL102
| G9 X II | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II has outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the G9 X II compared to the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the G9 X II and SL102.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The G9 X II due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will render extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon G9 X II vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called | - | ES55 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.2 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $530 | $130 |