Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300
92 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 209g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced October 2015
- Replacement is Canon G9 X II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and Casio. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the G9 X (20MP) and EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the G9 X (1") and EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G9 X was brought out 3 years later than the EX-ZR300 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the G9 X matches up vs the EX-ZR300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X and Casio Exilim EX-ZR300. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X Gallery and Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X over the Casio EX-ZR300
| G9 X | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2015 | May 2012 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Crisper screen (+579k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Canon G9 X
| EX-ZR300 | G9 X |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X and Casio EX-ZR300
| G9 X | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon G9 X offers outer dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 209 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-ZR300 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the G9 X vs the EX-ZR300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X and EX-ZR300 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X and EX-ZR300.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The G9 X featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Canon G9 X will resolve greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern G9 X will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon G9 X vs Casio EX-ZR300 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-10-12 | 2012-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 6 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 15 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 209g (0.46 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 63 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 495 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 500 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-13L | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $329 |