Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3
92 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 209g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Successor is Canon G9 X II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Renewed by Olympus E-5
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X (20MP) and E-3 (10MP) and the G9 X (1") and E-3 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe G9 X was manufactured 7 years after the E-3 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon G9 X being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the G9 X grades against the E-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X and Olympus E-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X Gallery and Olympus E-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X over the Olympus E-3
| G9 X | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2015 | February 2008 | Newer by 94 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Canon G9 X
| E-3 | G9 X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon G9 X and Olympus E-3
| G9 X | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X has got outside measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 209 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-3 has dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs).
Compare the Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the G9 X vs the E-3.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X and E-3 is 92 and 56 respectively.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X and E-3.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Canon G9 X will deliver extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent G9 X should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon G9 X vs Olympus E-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus E-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus E-3 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2015-10-12 | 2008-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 13.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 209g (0.46 lb) | 890g (1.96 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 63 | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | 10.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 495 | 571 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-13L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $399 | $670 |