Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 209g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched October 2015
- Updated by Canon G9 X II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the G9 X (20MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the G9 X (1") and TG-320 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe G9 X was launched 3 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the G9 X matches up against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot G9 X and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X over the Olympus TG-320
| G9 X | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2015 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 46 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon G9 X
| TG-320 | G9 X |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X and Olympus TG-320
| G9 X | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 209 grams (0.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the G9 X and the TG-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the G9 X and TG-320.
Clearly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The G9 X due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon G9 X will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent G9 X provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon G9 X vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2015-10-12 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 6 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 209 grams (0.46 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 63 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 495 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-13L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $399 | $0 |
