Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 209g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Newer Model is Canon G9 X II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon G9 X versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the G9 X (1") and VR-320 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe G9 X was brought out 4 years after the VR-320 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the G9 X scores vs the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot G9 X and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Canon G9 X Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X over the Olympus VR-320
| G9 X | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2015 | July 2011 | More modern by 52 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon G9 X
| VR-320 | G9 X |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X and Olympus VR-320
| G9 X | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X has exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 209 grams (0.46 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Canon G9 X versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the G9 X compared to the VR-320.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X and VR-320.
All in all, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The G9 X because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon G9 X will offer extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The younger G9 X is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon G9 X vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-10-12 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 209 grams (0.46 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 63 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 495 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-13L | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $399 | $179 |