Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and TG-320 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S200 was manufactured 2 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the S200 grades against the TG-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus TG-320
| S200 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon S200
| TG-320 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-320
| S200 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon S200 has got external measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the S200 vs the TG-320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S200 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and TG-320.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The S200 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will give you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent S200 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-02-21 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181g (0.40 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 pictures | 150 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $293 | $0 |
