Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon S200 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the S200 (10MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the S200 (1/1.7") and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe S200 was manufactured 14 months later than the TG-630 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the S200 scores versus the TG-630 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Canon S200 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon S200
| TG-630 iHS | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| S200 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon S200 has outside measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has dimensions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Canon S200 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the S200 versus the TG-630 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and TG-630 iHS is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and TG-630 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S200 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern S200 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2014-02-21 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6LH | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $293 | $200 |
