Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
35 Features
41 Overall
37
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Canon S200 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S200 was released 2 years after the VR-320 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the S200 grades against the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus VR-320
| S200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon S200
| VR-320 | S200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus VR-320
| S200 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon S200 features outside dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon S200 versus Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the S200 and the VR-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S200 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the S200 and VR-320.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The S200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer S200 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon S200 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-02-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $293 | $179 |