Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2
74 Imaging
68 Features
84 Overall
74
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f44a6/f44a61d96e60ef23cbe6f5283a6aca40a4012863" alt="Nikon Z50 front Nikon Z50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 397g - 127 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed October 2019
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Nikon Z50 versus Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z50 (21MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the Z50 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Z50 was unveiled 6 years after the E-PM2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Nikon Z50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Z50 scores vs the E-PM2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z50 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Nikon Z50 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z50 over the Olympus E-PM2
Z50 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | ![]() | May 2013 | Newer by 78 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Nikon Z50
E-PM2 | Z50 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon Z50 and Olympus E-PM2
Z50 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon Z50 enjoys exterior dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Nikon Z50 versus Olympus E-PM2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z50 vs the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf332/cf332c3778206877746bbe9e664d5528993a7873" alt="Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z50 and E-PM2 is 74 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74d86/74d8632b8469c3f6b928920fc33dada995a4df3a" alt="Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z50 and E-PM2.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Z50 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon Z50 will result in more detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent Z50 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81e8f/81e8feade72af2312b54ddde45ec49edb5ce500d" alt="Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6f33/f6f33a74aca26adf54d801cfc1082c11563f77f8" alt="Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Nikon Z50 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Z50 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-10-10 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 6 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 209 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 15 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 127 x 94 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery style | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL25 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $857 | $448 |